Tag Archive for: open data

New global index enables live transit benchmarking

A new interactive benchmarking platform has been launched, enabling transport authorities and operators to compare first-stop on-time performance across more than 1,000 locations worldwide using open data from the most recent 28-day period.

The Mosaiq Global Public Transit Index aggregates publicly available feeds into a single interface that allows side-by-side comparison between cities, regions and countries.

The platform replaces static reports with a rolling, regularly updated view of performance. Users can examine early, on-time and late running percentages and see how those metrics differ depending on local policy definitions.

Miki Szikszai (pictured), CEO, Snapper Services, told Cities Today that the initiative was developed in response to limitations in traditional benchmarking approaches and the fragmented nature of existing comparisons.

“The data that they’re working with is often really stale and it lacks context,” he said. “You can go to lots of sites and you can see a point in time where someone says, in 2024 here’s how our network performed, and that’s not really that helpful if you want to have really good context around how you’re performing, who your peers are, and how you can maybe take the next step.”

The index enables agencies to explore performance across hundreds of jurisdictions using the same underlying framework. It is intended to help leaders understand how their networks compare and identify potential peers for further analysis.

“We’re able to show data for February for close to 1,400 locations around the world, so you can explore and compare and work out actually how you’re doing, who you can learn from and what the next step might look like.”

A central feature of the platform is the visibility it gives to policy settings that shape punctuality metrics. Thresholds for early, on-time and late services differ significantly between countries and regions.

“There’s usually a window that’s used to define what is early, what is on time, what is late,” Szikszai said. “That varies around the world. Even being able to compare policy settings is really important.”

Szikszai said transport executives should begin by examining their own network before expanding outward to comparable peers. The objective is to identify systems operating under similar constraints rather than defaulting to headline international examples.

“They should look at their own city or location or country, and then they should just explore,” he said. “Start to get a sense of, actually, who might I learn from?”

He cautioned against drawing conclusions from headline performance figures without understanding structural differences.

“One of the stories I always hear is someone goes overseas and comes back saying, you should look at Tokyo, their public transport is amazing,” he commented. “But they won’t necessarily have that context of being able to even look at Tokyo and say, yes, Tokyo is amazing, but they have the narrowest on-time performance window in the world.”

The platform reflects only open data that has been published by authorities and operators. Where data is not available, the absence is visible within the summary results.

“If the train data is there, then we will be surfacing that,” he said. “If the data is not published as open data, then it will not appear at that summary level.”

In the UK, Szikszai said levels of open data maturity differ significantly between regions. Referring to London, he highlighted the gap between operational performance and publicly available datasets.

“One of the things that’s fascinating about London is it’s usually held up as a real paragon,” he added. “It does perform well, we know from closed data that we can see, but the open data is really weak. That’s because of the old iBus technology that they have there. They’ve got to do quite a bit of work on their infrastructure there to kind of lift it to the same level as other regions around the UK.”

Access to the index does not require registration and is positioned as an open resource for the sector.

“They don’t even need to log in,” he said. “This is open and free to use for everyone in terms of the index, because we think it really needs to be something that is a wide resource.”

Szikszai described the scale and openness of the dataset as distinctive in the market.

“We think this is a world first,” he added. “I don’t think there is anything anywhere that has this amount of data available for this many locations that is open and free.”

Images: Snapper Services

Boston launches Curb Lab to digitise and coordinate kerb space

Boston is deploying artificial intelligence and open data to bring real-time visibility to one of the most complex and contested parts of the street–the kerb.

The City of Boston has launched the Curb Lab, a cross-department initiative led by the Office of Emerging Technology to create and maintain a live digital understanding of parking regulations and build tools that help residents navigate them. The programme is designed to dynamically manage kerb space, reduce congestion and improve accessibility across the city.

For Michael Lawrence Evans, Director, Office of Emerging Technology, the drivers behind the initiative span multiple operational pressures.

“All of the above,” he told Cities Today, when asked what specific operational problem made the Curb Lab a priority–congestion, enforcement gaps, safety risks, or fragmented data. “Consider how often we rely on, use, or need information about a kerb where you live–the kerb is central to advancing our transportation planning challenges.”

Evans said the advent of rideshare, e-commerce delivery, more drivers in Boston than five years ago, and a continued commitment for accessibility have fundamentally changed kerb activity over the past decade. While the Curb Lab represents a new and focused solution, he stressed it builds on Boston’s historical effort to improve parking and kerb usage.

The initiative has been made possible by recent investments in the City of Boston’s technology stack. Three years ago, Boston stood up its own asset management platform, creating a live database of every sign in the city. Over the last year and a half, SMART grant funding from the US Department of Transportation enabled the city to build AI tools that leveraged that sign data to produce a digital kerb map.

“These technological developments set the stage for the Curb Lab; and create new opportunities for the City of Boston to share information, solve problems, and serve our residents,” Evans said.

The Curb Lab will convert hundreds of years of parking rules and historical information into a citywide digital map of parking regulations. With a publicly accessible database, residents will be able to quickly and reliably answer a simple question: can I park here?

Success will be measured not only by launching the platform, but by measurable improvements in accessibility and traffic flow. Evans said the team is developing new approaches to capturing metrics, many of which have never been reliably recorded before, and is exploring more privacy-preserving technologies alongside existing camera-based solutions.

“We see accessibility as a result of good kerb productivity: high occupancy rates with high turnover rates,” he said. “We want as many people to get as close to their destination as possible, but once occupancy creeps too high up and we see dwell times and dwell time violations rise, that’s when traffic becomes impacted.”

To improve traffic flow, the city will focus on behaviours known to reduce it, including cruising, double-parking events, idling minutes and lane minutes blocked, alongside measures such as traffic volumes and average signal control delay.

The initiative has also required governance changes to connect historically siloed kerb and parking systems. Boston established a Curb Coordination Committee and leveraged its open data portal to prototype and build foundational components before bringing stakeholders into later-stage discussions.

“This is where things get really exciting–and it goes well beyond the kerb,” he said. “Because kerb management is inherently multi-modal, building this foundation opens the door to thinking much more holistically about a city’s mobility challenges, including safety.”

He added that better access to kerb information could fundamentally shift how residents experience public infrastructure, moving the relationship “from anxiety and defensiveness–worrying about tickets and towing–to trust and confidence navigating public space.”

Image: Jorge Salcedo | Dreamstime.com